ArticleScientific reports2025
The modified cardiometabolic index as a simple screening tool for cardiovascular disease risk: a cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a pressing global health issue that poses substantial threats to public well-being. The modified cardiometabolic index (MCMI), a newly developed composite indicator linked to insulin resistance (IR) and central obesity, has not been extensively explored in terms of its association with the occurrence of CVD. To fill this research gap, we carried out a large-scale retrospective cohort study to examine how MCMI is associated with the onset of CVD. Additionally, we compared MCMI with the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index to evaluate the ability of both indices to predict CVD risk. This retrospective cohort study drew data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). It included participants who were 45 years of age or older, with baseline assessments conducted in 2011 and follow-up evaluations in 2020. The diagnosis of CVD was based on self-report. To explore the association between MCMI and the incidence of CVD, we used logistic regression models, restricted cubic splines, and subgroup analyses. Moreover, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive performance of both MCMI and the TyG index for CVD occurrence. Among the 6,117 participants in the total population, 1,298 eventually developed CVD. MCMI was identified as an independent risk factor for CVD development, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.18 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-1.29]. A J-shaped non-linear association between MCMI and the incidence of CVD was also discovered. Subgroup analyses showed that MCMI could stably predict CVD. In the comparison of predictive abilities, MCMI demonstrated a statistically superior but still modest predictive power compared to the TyG Index, as evidenced by area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.581 for MCMI and 0.559 for the TyG index (p < 0.001). This study indicated that the MCMI may serve as a preliminary screening indicator for cardiovascular disease risk in middle-aged and elderly populations. Although its independent predictive performance is limited, its simplicity and cost-effectiveness render it potentially useful in primary care settings and large-scale screening initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.