Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Association of diabetes, obesity, and their co-occurrence with suicide ideation in Korean adults using nationally representative data from 2019 to 2021.

Shiva Raj Acharya, Sudarshan Subedi, Diwash Timilsina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shiva Raj AcharyaYonsei University College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju, 26426, Republic of Korea. sameeracharya39@gmail.com.
Sudarshan SubediDepartment of Community Services, Torrens University of Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Diwash TimilsinaDepartment of Health Informatics, Swansea University, Sketty, Swansea, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the surging suicide rates in Korea, identifying the key contributing factors is crucial to mitigating associated risks. We analyzed nationally representative data from the Korea Health Panel Survey (KHPS) spanning three years (2019-21) to estimate the association of diabetes, obesity, and their co-occurrence with suicide ideation in Korean adults. After screening, a total of 32,166 eligible adults aged ≥ 19 years were included. Suicide ideation and diabetes were assessed via binary responses, whereas obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) was classified according to the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity (KSSO). Multilevel-adjusted regression models and subgroup analyses were performed. The prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and suicide ideation was 30.5% (95% CI: 30.0-31.0%), 14.4% (95% CI: 14.0-14.8%), and 5.5% (95% CI: 5.2-5.7%), respectively. Obesity (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.31), diabetes (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.52), and co-occurrence (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.61) were associated with an increased risk of suicide ideation. Diabetic (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.64), and obese females (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.21-1.74), and younger adults with obesity (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.12-1.98) exhibited higher odds of suicide ideation. This study demonstrates a strong positive link between obesity, diabetes, and their co-occurrence with suicide ideation. Recognizing the co-presence of these conditions as key contributors may be crucial in developing targeted interventions to mitigate suicide risk.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusObesitySuicidal IdeationAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRepublic of KoreaRisk FactorsYoung AdultCo-occurrenceDiabetesObesityRiskSuicide ideation

Identifiers

PMID41413214
PMCPMC12830967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.