ArticleScientific reports2025
Polygenic risk for autism spectrum disorder based on four group comparison across term and preterm birth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm birth increases the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Separately, polygenic risk scores (PRS) evaluate genetic liability to ASD. While both elevated PRS and preterm birth contribute to ASD risk, the extent to which gestational age interacts with genetic liability is unknown. We analyzed ASD PRS in 2387 individuals from the Center for Applied Genomics database, stratified by both ASD diagnosis (531 with ASD, 1856 without ASD) and gestational age (588 preterm, 1799 term). Term-born children with ASD had significantly higher ASD PRS compared to termborn controls (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03–1.32, p = 0.017), replicating prior studies. In contrast, no significant genetic difference was observed within our preterm cohort when stratifying by ASD diagnosis. We further identified a novel signal; preterm children overall had significantly lower ASD PRS compared to termborn children, even after controlling for ASD prevalence (coefficient: − 0.14, 95% CI − 0.21 to − 0.06, p = 0.00095). These findings suggest the predictive utility of ASD PRS may be contingent on gestational context. Lower genetic signal in preterm ASD could reflect stronger environmental stress, increased contributions from rare de novo variants, or undiscovered preterm-specific genetic risk loci.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.