ArticleScientific reports2025
Dynamic evolution of intracortical and corticomuscular connectivity during reach-and-grasp movement planning and execution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reach and grasp movements involve a complex transformation of information from visual to motor space. Initially, task-related information is encoded in extrinsic, object-centered spatial coordinates, whereas motor output is represented in intrinsic, body-centered coordinates. In this study, effective connectivity was assessed using Partial Directed Coherence (PDC) to examine both intracortical and corticomuscular interactions during self-initiated reach and grasp actions. EEG signals from 16 cortical channels and EMG signals from 6 upper limb muscles were analyzed in 20 healthy right-handed participants (aged 18 to 45) performing vertical and lateral grasping tasks with a self-selected limb. Intracortical connectivity was evaluated across four distinct time windows spanning the planning and execution phases, while corticomuscular connectivity, defined as directed interactions from EEG to EMG, was assessed continuously from one second before to one second after movement onset. The results revealed that intracortical connectivity evolved dynamically across the premovement and execution phases, reflecting a continuous modulation of cortical interactions during motor planning and performance. Corticomuscular connectivity from EEG to EMG consistently decreased around movement onset across all evaluated conditions. Although some differences were observed between the PDC curves related to the grasp types and the used limb, they did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons. These findings highlight the temporal specificity and task dependence of motor-related connectivity, offering insights into the distributed neural processes underlying sensorimotor transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.