ArticleNature communications2025
Utilizing nanoinducers for precision degradation of bacterial protein to mitigate antibiotic resistance.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance stands as a formidable global challenge to public health. Herein, we present a bacterial nanoinducer (bacNID) designed for targeted protein degradation in treating bacterial infections. Specifically, bacNID is engineered by grafting targeting peptides of MurD and SspB onto gold nanoparticles (GNPs). MurD plays a pivotal role in peptidoglycan production for cell wall synthesis, while SspB recruits SsrA-tagged proteins for degradation by ClpXP protease. The effectiveness of bacNIDs in targeted MurD degradation via ClpXP is demonstrated across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. Importantly, prolonged exposure to bacNIDs does not result in the acquisition of resistance in either Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) or Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium), even after 25 successive treatment passages. This stands in stark contrast to the rapid emergence of robust resistance observed with norfloxacin, evidenced by a 243-fold reduction in antibacterial activity against S. aureus after just 15 passages, and a 7410-fold decrease in activity against S. typhimurium over 22 passages. Moreover, the antimicrobial potential of bacNIDs is evaluated in vivo using S. aureus-infected nonhealing skin and corneal wounds. In summary, this study unveils a potent nanotechnology-driven strategy for targeted bacterial protein degradation with promising implications for in vivo antimicrobial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.