ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of head-trunk coordination measures for assessing sensorimotor function in laboratory and natural settings using wearable sensors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stabilization of the head in space is important for postural and locomotion control. Disruptions in head-trunk coordination can impair functional performance during aging, pathophysiology, or exposure to altered sensory environment states such as spaceflight. Monitoring head-trunk coordination could aid in understanding the risks associated with sensorimotor impairment. The present study evaluated a custom algorithm developed from parameters of head-trunk coordination obtained from wearable sensors. Task performance of healthy adults during standard laboratory tasks both with and without physical restriction via a neck brace were assessed to develop the algorithm and motion thresholds. The algorithm was applied to 12 blinded 4-hr datasets to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of the measures for identifying altered head-to-trunk coordination when a neck brace was worn during daily activities in a natural setting. The primary head-to-trunk coordination metrics showing high detection accuracy were the root mean square deviation between the angular velocity signals of the head and trunk, followed by the difference in the magnitude orientation. Additionally, the coherence of angular velocity along the X and Z global axes demonstrated good detection sensitivity. The present work lays the foundation for future applications, particularly in monitoring impaired head-trunk coordination in natural settings to provide valuable insights for rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.