Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413189›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of sulphate contamination in surface and groundwater with health hazards in the largest opencast lignite mine region of Asia.

B Preethi, T Subramani, D Karunanidhi, Berihu Abadi Berhe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B PreethiDepartment of Geology, College of Engineering Guindy (CEG), Anna University, Chennai, 600025, India.
T SubramaniDepartment of Geology, College of Engineering Guindy (CEG), Anna University, Chennai, 600025, India. geosubramani@annauniv.edu.
D KarunanidhiDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Mohan Babu University, Tirupati, 517102, India.
Berihu Abadi BerheSchool of Earth Sciences, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mekelle University, P.O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia. berihu.abadi@mu.edu.et.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-9689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water contamination from sulphate is a growing concern in the Neyveli region of South India, where industrial activities have significantly impacted water quality. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of sulphate contamination and associated non-carcinogenic health risks in surface- and groundwater systems within the Neyveli lignite-mining region of Tamil Nadu, India. A stratified pre-monsoon survey of 81 samples in which 30 groundwater samples (bore wells, hand pumps, and open wells), and 51 surface water (ash ponds, drainage canals, ponds) were analysed for pH, EC, TDS, salinity, and sulphate using UV-VIS spectrophotometry, and spatial patterns were visualised via IDW interpolation in ArcGIS 10.8. Sulphate concentrations ranged from ~ 6-2,486.7 mg L⁻¹, exceeding the WHO permissible value of 400 mg L⁻¹; hotspots clustered near mine pits, ash-pond cells, and drainage corridors (SW3, SW36, SW38, SW50, GW10). Correlation analysis indicated negligible to very weak associations with EC/TDS/salinity (r ≈ 0.15-0.17), suggesting localised enrichment mechanisms rather than uniform ionic loading. Age-/gender-specific risk appraisal showed Hazard Quotient (HQ) > 1 at 19 sites for children (23.4%), 18 for teenagers (22.2%), 13 for adult males (16.0%), and 11 for adult females (13.6%). Critical contamination hotspots were identified at SW3, SW36, SW38, SW50, and GW10, where HQ values consistently exceeded acceptable risk thresholds across multiple demographic categories. Analytical QA/QC supported data reliability (recoveries 96.4 ± 2.1%, duplicate RPD 1.8-4.2%). In response to these findings, Neyveli Lignite Corporation India Limited (NLCIL) has undertaken several mitigation initiatives, including Water Treatment Plants and groundwater recharge structures. To enhance water quality management, remediation strategies like RO, gypsum ion exchange, fly ash adsorption, and sulphate-reducing bioreactors are recommended.

Indexed as

GroundwaterMiningSulfatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdultChildEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansIndiaMaleWater QualitySulfatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalGroundwaterHuman health hazardLignite mine regionRemediation strategiesSulphate contaminationSurface water

Identifiers

PMID41413189
PMCPMC12827468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.