Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413165›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Stochastic growth marks in Crocodylus niloticus.

Anusuya Chinsamy, Maria-Eugenia Pereyra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anusuya ChinsamyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rhodes Gift, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa. Anusuya.chinsamy-turan@uct.ac.za.
Maria-Eugenia PereyraDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rhodes Gift, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletochronology combined with growth curve reconstruction is routinely used to assess the age and growth dynamics of extinct and extant vertebrates. Here we performed in vivo labelling studies of the bone histology of four 2 years-old Crocodylus niloticus individuals. We found that all the crocodiles have more growth marks in their compacta than expected for their age, i.e., they deposited stochastic growth marks in their bones. Using the fluorochrome markers we determined that these stochastic growth marks were deposited during their favourable season of growth. The variable preservation of growth marks in the crocodile bones highlights developmental plasticity in their growth, which can be extrapolated to extinct archosaurs, and other reptiles. We caution the use of growth marks in fossil bones as a reliable estimator of age and discuss the far-reaching implications this has for growth curve reconstruction and life history assessments of extinct vertebrates, such as nonavian dinosaurs.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesBone and BonesBone DevelopmentAnimalsFossilsStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID41413165
PMCPMC12804791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.