Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sensory processing sensitivity and overstimulation in daily life: an experience sampling method study.

Sofie Weyn, Corina U Greven, Stefanie J Schmidt, Céline R Gillebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofie WeynDivision of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. sofie.weyn@unibe.ch.
Corina U GrevenRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stefanie J SchmidtDivision of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Céline R GillebertDepartment of Brain & Cognition, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven PDMT2/22/017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals differ in how they perceive and process social and sensory information in their environment, a personality trait known as Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS). Approximately 30% of the general population scores high on this trait making them more responsive to both negative and positive environmental influences than individuals lower in SPS. Overstimulation is one of the biggest challenges associated with SPS. Associations between SPS, triggers, and fluctuations of overstimulation in everyday life were examined using an experience sampling method study (during one week with 5 prompts a day) in 139 healthy adults. Results showed that overstimulation increased in the afternoon to early evening and in the presence of others. Furthermore, more sensitive individuals reported higher levels of overstimulation when auditory and visual stimuli were rated as unpleasant, when fatigued, or in a negative mood. Yet, more sensitive individuals reported lower levels of overstimulation with momentary pleasant auditory and visual stimuli, when not fatigued, and in a positive mood at the current moment. Everyone, but particularly individuals high in SPS, may benefit from interventions preventing fatigue, promoting positive mood and the pleasantness of sensory stimuli in their daily environments to reduce feelings of overstimulation.

Indexed as

PersonalitySensationAcoustic StimulationAdultAffectAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationYoung AdultExperience sampling methodologyFluctuationsOverstimulationSensory processing sensitivityTriggers

Identifiers

PMID41413161
PMCPMC12808265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.