ArticleScientific reports2025
Coupling geometric morphometrics and machine learning for mandibular sex estimation in Late Pleistocene and Late Modern populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate sex estimation is crucial for studying both modern and ancient human populations, yet methods are often limited to well-preserved skeletons. Here, we combine Geometric Morphometrics (GM) and Machine Learning (ML) to assess mandibular sexual dimorphism and classify sex across a wide chronological and geographic range to bracket the potential of this approach. Sixty-seven individuals from the modern, identified Luis Lopes collection (Portugal) and 18 Late Pleistocene individuals from Jebel Sahaba (Sudan) were surface scanned. Anatomical landmark coordinates were extracted and analyzed with GM, and ML models were trained on a subset of the modern sample to predict sex in both the remaining modern individuals and the Late Pleistocene specimens. GM revealed significant sexual dimorphism in all samples, and ML achieved high intrapopulation classification accuracy. However, predictions were less reliable when applied across the temporally and geographically distant Jebel Sahaba population, reflecting interpopulation differences in mandibular size and shape. These results demonstrate that while GM–ML approaches are powerful tools for sex estimation within populations, caution is required when extending models to other populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.