ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of fiber reinforcement on the physico-mechanical properties and microstructure of artificial stones with marble and quartzite waste aggregates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study fabricated artificial stone samples using marble (carbonate-based) and quartzite (siliceous-based) waste aggregates, their corresponding fine powders, and Unsaturated Polyester Resin (UPR) via the Vacuum, Vibration, and Compression (VVC) method. After evaluating three resin percentages for each aggregate, the optimal formulations- Artificial Marble with 10 wt% resin (AM-10R) and Artificial Quartzite with 12 wt% resin (AQ-12R) were reinforced with Polypropylene (PP) and Glass fibers (GF). Different results were observed despite identical processing conditions. Fiber reinforcement in artificial quartzite maintained compressive strength (up to + 5% relative to the control) and showed a trend toward improved flexural strength (up to + 12.6% in the optimal formulation). In contrast, artificial marble exhibited significant reductions in compressive strength (16.5–22.8%) and flexural strength (4–21%), primarily attributed to increased porosity from 2.75% to 5.83%. Laser particle size analysis attributed this divergence to the different powder characteristics. The marble powder was significantly finer due to marble’s lower hardness, resulting in a stiffer resin-powder mixture with reduced workability. This impeded efficient air removal during the VVC process. The addition of fibers further worsened this issue in the marble-based composite, leading to higher porosity and diminished reinforcement efficiency. Therefore, Effective fiber reinforcement for strength improvement depends on precise porosity control through optimized manufacturing parameters, which is highly dependent on the aggregate-powder system’s properties. These findings provide practical guidance for producing stronger, eco-friendly artificial stones from industrial waste using optimized fiber–resin systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.