Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413136›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The stress-strain analysis of the entire construction process of underground diaphragm wall based on self-sensing FRP bar monitoring.

Jian Li, Qilong Shi, Shanchang Xu, Kangxin Sun, Yue Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jian LiGuangdong Provincial Highway Construction Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Qilong ShiCCCC Highway Long Bridge Construction National Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Shanchang XuTianjin Renai College, Tianjin, China. xushanchangedu@163.com.
Kangxin SunResearch Institute of Urbanization and Urban Safety, School of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
Yue LiuResearch Institute of Urbanization and Urban Safety, School of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFB3711600National Natural Science Foundation of China 52178097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diaphragm wall, as a key supporting structure in bridge anchorage projects, faces complex and variable stress conditions during construction. Therefore, ensuring structural safety and performance monitoring is crucial. Traditional rebar monitoring methods, due to poor corrosion resistance, insufficient real-time capabilities, and maintenance difficulties, cannot meet the high precision and reliability requirements of modern underground engineering. This study applies self-sensing technology to fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) materials by embedding optical fiber sensors within the FRP, enhancing real-time monitoring of stress and strain during the construction of diaphragm walls. This technology has been successfully implemented in the Shiziyang Bridge project, enabling real-time monitoring of stress and strain in the anchor diaphragm wall. The study adopts a quasi-distributed optical fiber monitoring scheme, combined with wireless transmission and a cloud platform for remote data acquisition and analysis. The results indicate that the self-sensing FRP bar shows excellent stress and strain monitoring capabilities at various stages of diaphragm wall construction. In stages 1-3, the stress curve transitions from tensile stress to alternating tensile and compressive stress. The shallow and mid-layers exhibit tensile stress, while the deep layers experience compressive stress. The maximum tensile stress recorded is 35.8 MPa, and the maximum compressive stress is -20.3 MPa, mainly due to pressure imbalance caused by soil excavation and the decreasing groundwater level. In stage 4, the upper stress gradually decreases, while the lower stress transitions from tensile to compressive, with the maximum tensile stress at 13.9 MPa and the maximum compressive stress at - 37.7 MPa. These changes are attributed to the completion of the liner and bottom slab construction, backfilling of the soil, and the increased self-weight of the upper structure. In stage 5, as construction progresses, the stress curve forms an M-shape, with compressive stress gradually decreasing. The maximum tensile stress is 2.3 MPa, and the maximum compressive stress is - 11.8 MPa, mainly influenced by the increasing tensile force applied by the stay cables. As of November 14, 2024, the monitoring data show that the tensile strain in the shallow layers remains unchanged, while the compressive strain in the middle and deep layers is gradually decreasing.

Indexed as

Real-time monitoringSelf-sensing FRP barStressUnderground diaphragm wall

Identifiers

PMID41413136
PMCPMC12800113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.