ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence and experiences of exclusive breastfeeding among working mothers at a tertiary hospital in Eastern Uganda.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is vital for infant health, yet working mothers often struggle to maintain it. In Uganda, particularly at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), evidence on EBF prevalence and the experiences of employed mothers remains limited. This study examined the prevalence of EBF and explored the experiences of working mothers seeking care at MRRH. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was used. Quantitatively, 221 working mothers with infants aged six months and below completed structured questionnaires. Qualitatively, 10 purposively selected mothers participated in in-depth interviews to provide detailed insights into their EBF experiences. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data, while thematic analysis identified patterns within qualitative narratives. EBF prevalence was 68.3%. Four themes emerged: Diverse breastfeeding practices, variable knowledge of EBF, and supportive factors and challenges/barriers to EBF. Mothers described adapting feeding schedules and responding to infant cues to sustain EBF. Knowledge varied, with some emphasizing nutritional and bonding benefits. Support from family members and proximity to the infant facilitated EBF, while work demands, short maternity leave, and inadequate breastfeeding-friendly facilities were major challenges. EBF among working mothers remains sub-optimal. Strengthened workplace policies and broader support systems are essential to enhance EBF continuity among employed women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.