ArticleScientific reports2025
Accurate prediction of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia using machine learning in critically ill patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia are common complications among critically ill patients. Maintaining blood glucose levels in the normal range is crucial but challenging due to complex influencing factors. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model that predicts hypo- or hyperglycemia 6 h in advance in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We analyzed electronic health records of 8,853 ICU patients (1,350,097 records) from a single center in Japan (2010-2022). Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were defined as blood glucose levels ≤ 80 mg/dL (4.4 mmol/L) and ≥ 180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L), respectively. We developed prediction models using routinely collected ICU data, including demographic, physiological, laboratory, and treatment variables. Machine learning models were developed using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), random forest, neural networks, and logistic regression. The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.939 and an F1 score of 0.520 for predicting hypoglycemia and an AUC of 0.919 and an F1 score of 0.702 for predicting hyperglycemia. It also achieved high calibration and net benefit. The machine learning models, notably the XGBoost algorithm, accurately predicted glucose abnormalities in critically ill ICU patients. These findings support its potential as a tool for early detection and proactive management of dysglycemia in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.