ArticleScientific reports2025
Evolving trends in dupilumab use for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP): a 4-year cohort analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) affects up to 4.5% of the population and is frequently driven by type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab, targeting IL‑4 and IL‑13 pathways, was approved in 2019 as the first biologic for CRSwNP in Germany. This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 174 patients initiating dupilumab between 2019 and 2023. Patients were grouped by year and assessed for trends in demographics, surgical history, and treatment response. Only adherent patients with ≥ 6 months of follow-up were included. Age and baseline disease severity were stable across cohorts. However, the proportion of patients with > 3 prior sinus surgeries declined from 28.3% in 2019/20 to 13.0% in 2023, suggesting earlier biologic initiation over time. All patients met at least three EPOS 2020 criteria. Significant and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in all cohorts for Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), SNOT‑22, VAS, and olfactory testing, with changes exceeding established minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). No cohort showed superior outcomes. Tese findings highlight consistent real-world efficacy of dupilumab and evolving prescribing patterns that favor earlier intervention, while reflecting continued cautious patient selection in the context of high treatment costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.