ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2026
The Air-Test score for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications after general anaesthesia: analysis of harmonised trial data and a prospective observational cohort.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Air-Test for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications after general anaesthesia: promise, performance and limitations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Air-Test score, which measures preoperative and postoperative Spo
methodsThis secondary analysis of a harmonised dataset comprised 3268 patients included in three multicentre RCTs and a prospective observational study of surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia. The patients were randomly split into training (n=2288, 70%) and validation (n=980, 30%) cohorts. The primary outcome was a composite of severe PPCs developing within the first 7 postoperative days. The exposure of interest was the Air-Test, evaluated by assessment of discriminative performance and area under the curve (AUC) calculation. We also assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values.
resultsSevere PPCs within 7 days of surgery were recorded in 164/3268 (5.0%) participants (mean age: 63.5 (49.7-77.3) yr; 39% female). Participants with a positive Air-Test were more likely to have severe PPCs in both training (odds ratio [OR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-3.15; P=0.007) and validation (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.27-4.61; P=0.011) cohorts. The AUCs for detecting PPCs in both cohorts were similar (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.64). In each cohort, sensitivity was 53-54%, specificity 59-60%, positive predictive value 6-8%, and negative predictive value 95-96%.
conclusionsThe Air-Test is a simple noninvasive bedside score with a good performance in identifying patients after major surgery who will not develop severe PPCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41412901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.