Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41412778›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2026

Loneliness and social isolation in transitions to adverse health conditions and mortality: an analysis of data from the UK Biobank study.

Kaisla Komulainen, Ripsa Niemi, Mai Gutvilig, Laura Cachón Alonso, Christian Hakulinen, Marko Elovainio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaisla KomulainenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland kaisla.komulainen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1576-7111
Ripsa NiemiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2055-170X
Mai GutviligDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0534-9222
Laura Cachón AlonsoDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5712-4475
Christian HakulinenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-9960
Marko ElovainioDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1401-1910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse health conditions may serve as intermediate states linking loneliness and social isolation with excess mortality. We examined whether loneliness and social isolation are primarily associated with the risk of developing an adverse health condition or with prognosis after diagnosis.

methodsA cohort of 236 879 individuals from the UK Biobank was followed from baseline in 2006-2010 until death or administrative end of follow-up in 2022. The incidence of three broad categories of adverse health conditions, (1) neoplasms, (2) endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases and (3) circulatory diseases, was recorded through self-report or register-based data. Progressive multistate Markov proportional hazards models were used to examine the associations of loneliness and social isolation with transitions from a healthy state to adverse health conditions and mortality, while adjusting for confounding.

resultsLoneliness and social isolation were associated with all three transitions: from a healthy state to adverse health conditions (except for neoplasms), from a healthy state to mortality and from adverse health conditions to mortality. In transitions to adverse health conditions, the HRs were larger for loneliness (HR range 1.12-1.17 for loneliness, 1.05-1.08 for social isolation). In subsequent transitions to mortality, the HRs were larger for social isolation (1.05-1.13 for loneliness, 1.28-1.42 for social isolation).

conclusionWhile both loneliness and social isolation were associated with the onset and prognosis of adverse health conditions, our findings highlight the associations of social isolation, in particular, with mortality.

Indexed as

Health StatusLonelinessMortalitySocial IsolationAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsUK BiobankUnited KingdomCOHORT STUDIESMORBIDITYMORTALITY

Identifiers

PMID41412778
PMCPMC13018730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.