Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41412615›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Clinical effectiveness of biofeedback for treating stress urinary incontinence in women: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Shirley Zhaoxue Liu, Gladys Lai-Ying Cheing, Priya Kannan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06126757 (An Innovative, Non-invasive, Biofeedback Device for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06126757 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

An Innovative, Non-invasive, Biofeedback Device for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: Evaluation and Mechanism Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled132ConditionsStress Urinary IncontinenceArmsPelviSense-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, Active Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shirley Zhaoxue LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-7504
Gladys Lai-Ying CheingFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Priya KannanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China priya.Kannan@polyu.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPelvic floor muscle (PFM) training (PFMT) is a standard conservative first-line treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. However, the success of PFMT alone, without adjunctive therapies, has been hindered by the lack of adherence among women, who report the inability to contract the correct PFMs and limited motivation to perform PFMT exercises. Therefore, PFMT is often combined with adjunctive therapies, such as biofeedback (BF). The conventional BF device employed in clinical practice is invasive and involves the insertion of an intravaginal probe, causing pain or discomfort for women. Therefore, our team developed the PelviSense, a non-invasive BF device for use as a PFMT adjunct. The proposed randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to (1) investigate the efficacy of PelviSense-assisted PFMT compared with unassisted PFMT in reducing SUI in women, and (2) identify the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of PelviSense-assisted PFMT for the treatment of SUI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, two-arm, parallel-group RCT will be conducted. It will involve 132 women aged 18-60 years with SUI or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence, who will be randomised into PelviSense-assisted (n=66) or unassisted (n=66) PFMT groups using a computer-generated randomisation schedule. Supervised PelviSense-assisted and unassisted PFMT will be provided on a one-to-one basis for 30 min, three times per week, for 4 weeks. Following the supervised training period, participants will perform the exercises at home unsupervised for 24 weeks, with or without the PelviSense device, according to their assigned group. The primary outcome will be the severity of urine loss, measured using the 1-hour pad test. The secondary outcomes will be the severity of SUI symptoms, measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and quality of life, measured using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form. The mediating outcomes will include PFM strength, measured using the Modified Oxford scale, as well as levator hiatus area and bladder neck position, measured by transperineal ultrasound. The outcomes will be assessed at baseline (week 0), postintervention (week 4) and at follow-up (week 28). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This RCT has received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (approval number: HSEARS20211104002-02). Its findings will be disseminated to participants via written feedback on PFMT performance using the PelviSense device, to the general public via public lectures, to healthcare professionals via interactive workshops and to researchers via articles in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06126757.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyExercise TherapyPelvic FloorUrinary Incontinence, StressAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBladder disordersUltrasoundUrinary incontinences

Identifiers

PMID41412615
PMCPMC12716565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.