ArticleBMJ open2025
Interventions, adaptive strategies and best practices improving maternal nutritional health in changing climatic conditions and diverse cultural contexts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of poor nutritional health on maternal and infant morbidity and mortality remains high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), exacerbated by climate change-linked disasters. Maternal nutritional health, as a modifiable factor, is influenced by various social, political, economic and environmental factors, as well as cultural practices. Identifying climate change-related interventions, adaptive strategies and best practices targeting maternal nutritional health and well-being in LMICs within a cultural context helps inform the co-production of sustainable, culturally sensitive interventions to improve health outcomes for mothers and babies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will undertake a systematic review of the literature employing the six steps of the Protocol, Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis and Report (PSALSAR) framework, including both peer-reviewed and grey literature. The Population, Concept and Context approach will be used to formulate the review question and the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We will include primary research comprising all study designs published in English from 2007 onwards. We will conduct searches in online academic databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, Global Health (CABI), AGRIS (FAO) and SCOPUS, as well as defined grey literature sources (ie, Google Scholar). Titles, abstracts and later full-text articles will be independently accessed and screened for eligibility criteria by four researchers. Following the integrative review methodology, we will present findings narratively, organised around the components of the PSALSAR framework to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no primary data will be collected, the systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. However, we will give attention to ethical considerations within the identified studies. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. The findings of our systematic review and the ethnographic component of our research project will inform the development of appropriate maternal nutritional health interventions using co-production methodology in Pakistan. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251080897.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.