Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41412354›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance imaging2026

The nature and interpretation of BOLD signals in white matter - A review.

J C Gore, M Li, K G Schilling, L Xu, Y Li, Z Zu, A W Anderson, Z Ding, Y Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Reply to Panfoli et al.: From OProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J C GoreVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: John.gore@vanderbilt.edu.
M LiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
K G SchillingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
L XuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Y LiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Z ZuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
A W AndersonVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Z DingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Y GaoVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Biophysical Basis of Functional Connectivity by MRIR01NS078680 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Li Min Chen, John C Gore · 2012 to 2026
$7.6M
Resting State Connectivity in White MatterR01NS093669 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Biophysical basis of functional MRI of white matterR01NS113832 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Functional Connectome of Brain White MatterR01NS129855 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAOHUA DING · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Secondary analysis of functional MRI and resting state connectivity in white matterRF1MH123201 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C, LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2021 to 2021
$1.3M
Influence of Sensory and Motor Dysfunctions on White - Gray Matters Functional Connectome in Preclinical ADR21AG083915 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GAO, YURUI · 2024 to 2024
$438k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG083915NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123201NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078680NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093669NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113832NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes selected recent findings demonstrating the dependence of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals in white matter (WM) on tissue microstructure, composition, vascular properties and metabolism, as well as their relationships to fMRI signals within gray matter (GM) networks. BOLD signals in WM are robustly detectable after a stimulus, and at rest their temporal variations reveal synchronized networks and correlated neural activities involving both WM and GM. However, to date, most analyses of brain fMRI data have ignored WM signals, and often have removed them as nuisance regressors. However, emerging evidence clearly demonstrates that WM BOLD signals represent potentially important and heretofore overlooked indicators of neural activities that are intimately related to how cortical regions communicate, and so should be incorporated into more complete models of brain functional organization. Here we review recent work that contributes to our understanding of their interpretation and significance. The factors that affect the magnitude and other characteristics of BOLD responses in WM are becoming more clear, and recent studies have demonstrated and quantified the relationships between BOLD signals and vascular and microstructural properties of WM tracts. These relationships depend on the degree of myelination and neurite and mitochondrial densities, but they also are qualitatively different when comparing different fiber types, notably association versus projection fibers. Some fully myelinated fibers appear to not show detectable BOLD effects. The relationships between WM and GM BOLD signals, the contributions of GM resting state correlations and signals to WM BOLD signals, and the engagement of WM in GM networks, are also becoming more clear. These findings supplement the growing literature demonstrating practical, clinical applications of BOLD in WM. The goal of this review is to highlight recent research that demonstrates how WM and GM activities are related, and to stimulate further investigations that may produce a more complete model of brain organization.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingOxygenWhite MatterAnimalsGray MatterHumansOxygenConnectivityFMRIResting stateWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID41412354
PMCPMC12755079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.