Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41412341›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026

Regulatory flexibility and psychological health - Is more always better?

Kaitlyn M Werner, David A Preece, Elliot T Berkman, James J Gross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaitlyn M WernerUniversity of Oregon, Department of Psychology and Center for Translational Neuroscience, Eugene, OR, USA; University of Tartu, Institute of Psychology, Estonia. Electronic address: kmwerner@uoregon.edu.
David A PreeceStanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, CA, USA; Curtin University, School of Population Health, Perth, Australia; University of Western Australia, School of Psychological Science, Perth, Australia.
Elliot T BerkmanUniversity of Oregon, Department of Psychology and Center for Translational Neuroscience, Eugene, OR, USA.
James J GrossStanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Construal level as a novel pathway for affect regulation and cancer controlR01CA240452 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BERKMAN, ELLIOT TODD · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Devaluing Energy-Dense Foods for Cancer Control: Translational NeuroscienceR01CA211224 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BERKMAN, ELLIOT TODD · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Navigating Educational Trajectories in NeuroscienceR25MH131653 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Cristopher M Niell, Jennifer Hope Pfeifer · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211224NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240452NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH131653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory flexibility, defined as the ability to use strategies in accordance with contextual demands, is thought to be central to psychological health. In the current research, we test the boundaries of this claim by examining: (1) how broadly does regulatory flexibility relate to different facets of psychological health?, and (2) is more flexibility always better? Across six samples, participants (N = 2939) reported their ability to use strategies flexibly when managing impulses (e.g., temptations) and completed indicators of ill-being and well-being. Findings indicated that people who are more flexible report not only less anxiety and depression but also more positive functioning, including more life satisfaction, meaning, thriving, and positive mental health. There was some goal-to-goal variation, but the same pattern held when controlling for goal-specific covariates and replicated in both meta-analytic and mega-analytic approaches. Interestingly, there was a significant quadratic association between flexibility and well-being but not ill-being. This suggested diminishing returns, such that being more flexible was beneficial for well-being, but only to a certain point. Overall, these findings suggest that having the ability to use strategies flexibly has no apparent downside.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionYoung AdultAffect regulationAnxietyDepressionRegulatory flexibilityStrategiesWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41412341
PMCPMC12857431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.