Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41412300›Full record

ReviewSurvey of ophthalmology

Prognostic factors for age-related macular degeneration progression: An overview of systematic reviews.

Christian A Holt, Carter Niedert, Miguel Gedtal, Gianni Virgili, Ruth E Hogg, Riaz Qureshi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Survey of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian A HoltUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States.
Carter NiedertUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States.
Miguel GedtalCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom.
Gianni VirgiliCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom; Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Italy.
Ruth E HoggCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom.
Riaz QureshiDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States. Electronic address: riaz.qureshi@cuanschutz.edu.

Funding

Maximizing Use of High-Quality Evidence in Eye Care: Cochrane Eyes and Vision US ProjectUG1EY020522 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Tianjing Li · 2017 to 2026
$10.1M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY020522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive and irreversible degenerative disease of the retina. Slowing progression to late AMD is the only way to prevent vision loss. Given that AMD treatments are noncurative, understanding the personal characteristics associated with progression is of critical importance for people with increased AMD risk. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) to assess the scope of the existing literature on prognostic factors (PFs) for AMD progression. We included all systematic reviews of PFs for the progression of AMD from early or intermediate to late. We used the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Database of Systematic Reviews (current to September, 2024). We identified 64 potentially relevant studies in the database and included 17 SRMAs, which most commonly studied functional or structural ocular (10/17), lifestyle (7/17), and intervention-related factors (7/17). Across all reviews, 218 PFs were reported. We extracted 79 and grouped these into 20 distinct types of PFs across 8 categories. The modifiable PFs with most evidence for slowing progression were increased dietary supplementation with antioxidants and multivitamins and reduced smoking. Most PFs were non modifiable. Although most PFs may not be targetable, by integrating high-risk optical coherence tomography findings, monitoring relevant comorbidities, and considering individual lesion characteristics, clinicians may better predict disease trajectories and support patients in slowing progression and preserving vision. Notably, no reviews studied social determinants as potential PFs for AMD progression, representing a critical gap in the evidence base. Future reviews should investigate social, systemic, and AI-identified biomarkers to provide a more comprehensive understanding of AMD progression.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationSystematic Reviews as TopicDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceAge-related macular degenerationEvidence synthesisOverviewPrognosisPrognostic factorsUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41412300
PMCPMC13523673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.