ArticleNeuron2026
Synchrony timescales underlie irregular neocortical spiking.
Article in Neuron, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The fluctuation-based regime of thalamocortical circuitry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Global and local origins of trial-to-trial spike count variability in visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Subthreshold moment analysis of neuronal populations driven by synchronous synaptic inputs.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Subthreshold variability of neuronal populations driven by synchronous synaptic inputs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cortical neurons are characterized by their variable spiking patterns. Here, we examine the specific hypothesis that cortical synchrony drives spiking variability in vivo. Using dynamic clamps, we demonstrate that intrinsic neuronal properties do not contribute substantially to spiking variability, but rather spiking variability emerges from weakly synchronous network drive. With large-scale electrophysiology, we quantify the degree of synchrony and its timescale in cortical networks in vivo. The timescale of synchrony shifts in a range from 25 to 200 ms, depending on the presence of external sensory input. In particular, when the network moves from spontaneous to driven modes, the synchrony timescales shift from slow to fast, leading to a natural reduction in response variability across cortical areas. Finally, while an individual neuron exhibits reliable responses to physiological drive, different neurons respond in a distinct fashion according to their intrinsic properties, contributing to stable synchrony across the neural network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.