Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41411861›Full record

SynthesisPoultry science2026

Significance of specialty protein ingredients in feeding programs for broiler chickens on nitrogen utilization and excretion-A meta-analysis.

Felix M Njeri, Elijah G Kiarie, Jennifer L Ellis

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felix M NjeriDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Postal address: 50 Stone Road E, N1G 2W1 Guelph, ON, Canada. Electronic address: fmuchiri@uoguelph.ca.
Elijah G KiarieDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Postal address: 50 Stone Road E, N1G 2W1 Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jennifer L EllisDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Postal address: 50 Stone Road E, N1G 2W1 Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialty protein ingredients (SPI) such as processed animal proteins (PAP), insect proteins (IP), algae, and further-processed vegetable proteins (PVP), are increasingly incorporated into broiler diets. However, variation in crude protein (CP) intake and the inclusion levels of these ingredients across studies can confound their reported effects. To address this heterogeneity, the present meta-analysis used a mixed-effects meta-regression model that adjusted performance responses for both CP intake and SPI inclusion level, enabling a standardized comparison of ingredient efficacy. The hypothesis was that PVP and PAP would perform similarly to conventional soybean meal (SBM) and outperform IP and algae due to their higher digestibility and more balanced amino acid profiles reported in the literature. Data from 53 peer-reviewed studies were integrated into a mixed-effects model (PROC GLIMMIX, SAS), with study as a random effect and SPI type and CP intake as fixed effects. The model predictions were average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and nitrogen balance. During the starter and grower phases, PVP, PAP and SBM resulted in the highest ADG and 8-15% reduction in nitrogen excretion (P < 0.001). In the finisher phase, SBM had the highest overall performance, while PVP and PAP had similar results (P < 0.001). The performance response to CP intake revealed that algae had the steepest positive slopes at low intake and the largest quadratic declines at higher intakes (P < 0.001). IP also showed quadratic performance declines at higher intake levels (P < 0.001), particularly above 10 % inclusion. PVP and SBM showed minimal quadratic effects, and PAP showed a moderate decline in nitrogen efficiency in the finisher phase (P < 0.01). In conclusion, PVP and PAP are effective alternative protein sources. In contrast, algae and high inclusion of IP are less suitable because of their lower protein quality. These findings offer a quantitative basis for feed formulation and guide future research aimed at improving the digestibility and amino acid profiles of algae and IP.

Indexed as

Animal FeedChickensDietary ProteinsNitrogenAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary ProteinsNitrogenAlgaeInsect meal proteinProcessed animal proteinProcessed soybean mealProcessed vegetable protein

Identifiers

PMID41411861
PMCPMC12950380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.