ArticleBlood advances2026
Ten-year experience of CD22 CAR T cells for children and young adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02315612 (Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Anti-CD22 Chimeric Receptor T Cells in Pediatric and Young Adults With Recurrent or Refractory CD22-expressing B Cell Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Anti-CD22 Chimeric Receptor T Cells in Pediatric and Young Adults With Recurrent or Refractory CD22-expressing B Cell Malignancies
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential cytokine architecture in patients treated with CART19 versus CART22.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of CAR T cell therapy in children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- CD19/CD22 bivalent CAR T cells in children, adolescents and young adults with B-ALL: final phase 1 trial results.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Zanubrutinib in B-cell lymphomas: from clinical pharmacology to therapeutic application.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIn 2014, the first patient received a CD22 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product. As one of the earliest approaches targeting an antigen other than CD19, this trial addressed an unmet need while providing insights into CAR T-cell efficacy, impact of manufacturing changes, and management of inflammatory toxicities over its 10-year span. This final chapter provides a comprehensive review of the collective findings. Across 78 patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received infusion, cytokine release syndrome was observed in 66 (84.6%) patients, whereas 28 (35.9%) had immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), and 18 (23.1%) had reversible neurotoxicity. Complete response was achieved in 54 (70.1%) patients by day 28, of whom 45 (83.3%) were measurable residual disease negative. Median overall survival was 13.6 months, and median relapse-free survival was 6.1 months. Pharmacokinetics revealed peak CAR T-cell expansion at a median of 14 days (range, 12-50), with no variation by dose. Interestingly, toxicities, CAR T-cell expansion, and disease response did not correlate with baseline disease burden. Additionally, although early intervention approaches to mitigate IEC-HS severity for this construct appeared promising, further study is needed. Given the critical importance of CD22 targeting, this experience serves as a foundation for new approaches targeting CD22 while providing ongoing support for dual-targeting approaches and insights into toxicity mitigation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02315612.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.