Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41411486›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2026

Ten-year experience of CD22 CAR T cells for children and young adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Alexandra Dreyzin, Bonnie Yates, Haneen Shalabi, Sara K Silbert, Hao-Wei Wang, Constance M Yuan, Chloe N Hoang, August A Culbert, Flavia Gava, Monica S Nair and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02315612 (Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Anti-CD22 Chimeric Receptor T Cells in Pediatric and Young Adults With Recurrent or Refractory CD22-expressing B Cell Malignancies), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02315612 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Anti-CD22 Chimeric Receptor T Cells in Pediatric and Young Adults With Recurrent or Refractory CD22-expressing B Cell Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2014 to 2024Enrolled134ConditionsNHL, Large Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, ALLArmsCD22-CAR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alexandra DreyzinPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-290X
Bonnie YatesPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Haneen ShalabiPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Sara K SilbertPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Hao-Wei WangLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-5408-9253
Constance M YuanLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-2601-3665
Chloe N HoangPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
August A CulbertPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Flavia GavaPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Monica S NairPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Victoria M GiordaniPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Lauren LittlePediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Toni FoleyPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Veronique NussenblattLaboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Terry J FryDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0001-8044-5226
David F StroncekCenter for Cellular Engineering, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Steven L HighfillCenter for Cellular Engineering, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Nirali N ShahPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-9080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractIn 2014, the first patient received a CD22 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product. As one of the earliest approaches targeting an antigen other than CD19, this trial addressed an unmet need while providing insights into CAR T-cell efficacy, impact of manufacturing changes, and management of inflammatory toxicities over its 10-year span. This final chapter provides a comprehensive review of the collective findings. Across 78 patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received infusion, cytokine release syndrome was observed in 66 (84.6%) patients, whereas 28 (35.9%) had immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), and 18 (23.1%) had reversible neurotoxicity. Complete response was achieved in 54 (70.1%) patients by day 28, of whom 45 (83.3%) were measurable residual disease negative. Median overall survival was 13.6 months, and median relapse-free survival was 6.1 months. Pharmacokinetics revealed peak CAR T-cell expansion at a median of 14 days (range, 12-50), with no variation by dose. Interestingly, toxicities, CAR T-cell expansion, and disease response did not correlate with baseline disease burden. Additionally, although early intervention approaches to mitigate IEC-HS severity for this construct appeared promising, further study is needed. Given the critical importance of CD22 targeting, this experience serves as a foundation for new approaches targeting CD22 while providing ongoing support for dual-targeting approaches and insights into toxicity mitigation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02315612.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptivePrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2T-LymphocytesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCytokine Release SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCD22 protein, humanReceptors, Chimeric AntigenSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2

Identifiers

PMID41411486
PMCPMC12964031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.