ArticlePloS one2025
Do government subsidies lead to TFP losses? A perspective on the formation of zombie firms.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines how government subsidies affect aggregate total factor productivity (TFP) through the formation of zombie firms in China. Using panel data of A-share listed firms from 2007 to 2022 and industry-province-year aggregates, we analyze both firm-level dynamics and aggregate productivity outcomes. The results show that subsidies reduce the exit probability of low-productivity firms and significantly increase the likelihood of zombie firm formation. Although the prevalence of zombie firms fluctuates over time, it remains a persistent challenge. At the aggregate level, subsidies exert a negative impact on TFP, with zombie firm prevalence serving as a key mediating channel. The mediating effect is particularly strong in industries with a higher share of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), whereas regional differences stem from distinct mechanisms: subsidies more strongly induce zombie formation in Central-Western China, while the productivity drag of zombies is larger in the more competitive Eastern region. These findings highlight the unintended productivity costs of subsidy policies and underscore the need for more targeted and efficiency-oriented intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.