Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41411325›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Athlete maltreatment in sport: Protocol for a scoping review.

David M Brown, Amy E Nesbitt, Sasha Gollish, Tara-Leigh F McHugh, Catherine M Sabiston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David M BrownFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-2774
Amy E NesbittRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-3369
Sasha GollishFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5250-576X
Tara-Leigh F McHughFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Catherine M SabistonFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8419-6666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on maltreatment in sport demonstrates detrimental effects on athletes' well-being, and recent news reports highlight the pervasiveness of this issue. However, inconsistencies in defining and operationalizing athlete maltreatment in sport have resulted in issues with conceptual clarity that limits current research, practice, and monitoring within and across sport sectors. This scoping review will synthesize the scientific literature on athlete maltreatment in sport and identify current knowledge gaps for research and practice. The review objectives are to: (1) map how maltreatment has been conceptualized and operationalized in the literature; (2) identify and describe the types of athlete maltreatment that have been investigated; and (3) explore current trends in research approaches and methods applied to the study of athlete maltreatment. An established six-stage scoping review methodology will be applied, as well as field-specific guidelines for community advisory group consultations. The protocol will be conducted over a one-year time frame and has been registered in advance (https://osf.io/r7ycp/overview). Relevant sources will be identified using a systematic search strategy across six electronic databases. Study screening procedures will occur in duplicate using pre-determined eligibility criteria. For inclusion, articles must address the concept of maltreatment among athletes (of any age, sport, or competition level), and contain original peer-reviewed research. Extracted data will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics. Preliminary results will be presented to community advisors (e.g., athletes, coaches, sport administrators, clinicians, policy writers, researchers) to contextualize findings and prioritize actionable recommendations to improve sport systems. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences for sport leaders and researchers with the aim of informing measures, interventions, frameworks, and/or policies.

Indexed as

AthletesSportsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41411325
PMCPMC12714210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.