ArticlePloS one2025
Single-cell RNA-seq data normalization: A benchmarking study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the noise and biases introduced by technical factors in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, presenting a thorough benchmarking analysis of six widely utilized normalization methods. The evaluation of these methods is conducted from three perspectives: cell clustering, differential expression analysis, and computational resource requirements, utilizing seven real datasets alongside four simulated datasets. The findings indicate that Dino excels in clustering 10 × datasets and those with a substantial number of cells, while scTransform demonstrates strong performance with datasets produced through full-length library preparation protocols. Additionally, SCnorm is identified as suitable for small-scale datasets. This research serves as a significant reference for scholars in selecting appropriate normalization tools, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of subsequent analyses of scRNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.