Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41411268›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Belief in science-related conspiracy theories is not just a matter of knowledge: The democratic quality of countries as a protective factor.

Irene López-Navarro, Libia Santos-Requejo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irene López-NavarroUniversidad de Salamanca, Instituto de Estudios de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Edificio I+D+i C/Espejo, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9013-6128
Libia Santos-RequejoUniversidad de Salamanca, Instituto de Estudios de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Edificio I+D+i C/Espejo, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-7706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns regarding the increasing prevalence of conspiracy theory beliefs are growing in public discourse. This study investigates science-related conspiracy theories due to their significant potential impact on individual and global health. Using data from a Special Eurobarometer survey (n = 37,079), our research demonstrates the importance of considering public perceptions of science when trying to understand the acceptance of such conspiracy theory beliefs. They are strongly associated with mistrust in scientists and lower level of knowledge. But there is a key factor at the country level, the quality of democracy, which plays a protective role against the acceptance of unwarranted beliefs. Even individuals with lower levels of knowledge or greater mistrust of scientists are less likely to believe in science-related conspiracy theories if they live in democratic countries than in authoritarian states.

Indexed as

CultureDemocracyKnowledgePublic OpinionScienceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTrust

Identifiers

PMID41411268
PMCPMC12714214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.