Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41411066›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience research2025

Repetitive Blast Exposure Drives Chronic Pain in Female Rats.

Amirah Wright, Susan F Murphy, Pamela J VandeVord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amirah WrightDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Susan F MurphyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Pamela J VandeVordDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-2704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical studies have established that repeated blast traumatic brain injury (rbTBI) can result in chronic pain conditions, with outcomes exhibiting notable sex-dependent differences. However, limited preclinical rbTBI models have systematically investigated the behavioral and neuropathological outcomes of female subjects. In the present study, adult female rats were subjected to repeated blast exposures, and the subsequent development of chronic pain-related behaviors and neuropathological changes was assessed. Repeated blast events induced robust mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity beginning 48 h post-injury and persisted through 12 weeks, accompanied by anxiety and depressive-like behaviors at the chronic time point. These behavioral alterations were associated with increased glial activity, as evidenced by Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ionized Calcium-Binding Adaptor Molecule 1 (IBA-1) in the frontal cortex and posterior nucleus regions at 12 weeks following injury. Notably, expression levels of neuropeptide markers, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and Substance P (SP), remained unchanged. Collectively, these findings suggest that chronic pain behaviors following rbTBI in females are mediated primarily by sustained glial activation rather than neuropeptide dysregulation.

Indexed as

Blast InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticChronic PainAnimalsAnxietyBehavior, AnimalDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHyperalgesiaNeurogliaRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyGlial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

Identifiers

PMID41411066
PMCPMC12714028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.