ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2026
MET alterations are enriched in lung adenocarcinoma brain metastases, defining a distinct biologic subtype.
Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung Cancer Brain Metastasis: Brain Microenvironmental Adaptation, Therapeutic Resistance and Translational Strategies.Cancer science · 2026Review
- Article
- Monocyte-mediated mechanisms in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: opportunities for early intervention.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer exhibits the highest rates of brain metastases (BMs) among all solid tumors, presenting a major clinical challenge. The development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting BMs is clearly needed. We identified a significant enrichment of MET amplification in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) BMs compared with primary LUAD and extracranial metastases in oncogene driver-negative patients. Of note, MET-amplified BMs were responsive to MET inhibitors in vivo, including models with acquired MET amplification at the time of metastasis. MET alterations (amplifications and/or mutations) were also more frequently detected in circulating tumor DNA from patients with LUAD BMs than in those without BMs. MET-altered BMs also demonstrated unique genomic features compared with non-MET-altered BMs. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that in contrast to MET WT BMs, MET-amplified BMs exhibited a more inflamed tumor microenvironment and displayed evidence of metabolic adaptation, particularly a reliance on glycolysis in contrast to OXPHOS in MET WT BMs. Furthermore, MET-amplified BMs demonstrated evidence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling, including increased expression of TWIST1. Patients with MET-amplified BMs had significantly shorter overall survival. These findings highlight MET amplification as a critical driver of LUAD BMs, emphasizing its potential as a therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.