ArticleClinical drug investigation2026
Unexpected Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction of Fexinidazole on Midazolam Pharmacokinetics: Insights into Underlying Mechanisms from Clinical Phase I Study Results and Supporting In Vivo/Vitro Evidence.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Fexinidazole in Subjects with Hepatic Impairment.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Understanding Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments for CYP3A-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions: An Analysis of FDA-Approved Drugs From 2015 to 2024.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFexinidazole, a nitroimidazole antiparasitic, has been approved to treat human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) worldwide. In vitro studies have shown that fexinidazole inhibits and weakly induces CYP3A4/5. In silico predictions indicated that fexinidazole, which has a significant intestinal and liver first-pass metabolism, could increase the exposure of a sensitive probe substrate of CYP3A4 by two-fold. Therefore, this study investigated the potential clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of fexinidazole with CYP3A4 substrates.
objectiveTo assess the effect of fexinidazole on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a well-recognised sensitive CYP3A4 substrate (and its metabolites 1-hydroxy-midazolam and N-glucuronide-midazolam) in humans and to elucidate the underlying mechanism of the in vivo DDI.
methodsThis was a phase I, open-label, single-centre, non-randomised, single-sequence, two-period, two-treatment crossover study. The study population consisted of 12 healthy male and female participants. The two treatment periods included Period 1, wherein a single midazolam dose was administered on Day 1, and Period 2, wherein fexinidazole was administered once daily from Day 1 to Day 5, with a single midazolam dose co-administered on Day 4. Key pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam and its main metabolites, including the maximum plasma concentration (C
resultsContrary to the in vitro predictions, fexinidazole significantly reduced midazolam exposure in vivo, resulting in a reduction of 39% in C
conclusionWhile in vitro studies showed weak induction by fexinidazole and its metabolite M1, the clinical pharmacokinetic data provided stronger evidence, supporting the conclusion that fexinidazole is a moderate inducer of CYP3A4/5 in vivo. Thus, it is suggested to update the product information by including the potential for CYP3A4/5 induction in vitro, removing the risk of CYP3A4 inhibition in vivo, and adding clinical interaction data highlighting the risk of induction on drugs predominantly metabolised by CYP3A4/5.
trial registrationEudraCT No.: 2021-004533-36.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.