Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410792›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026

Regulations for international non-proprietary name prescribing and substitution, relevant for cross-border ePrescribing and eDispensation services in the European Union.

Robert Vander Stichele, Joseph Roumier, Dirk Van Nimwegen, Dipak Kalra, Argiris Gkogkidis, Nicole Vegiotti, Yuri Quintana, Petra Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert Vander SticheleEuropean Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent University, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9118-9651
Joseph RoumierEuropean Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent University, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-7056-6154
Dirk Van NimwegenEuropean Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent University, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2720-2182
Dipak KalraEuropean Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent University, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2998-9882
Argiris GkogkidisGnomon Informatics, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-8212
Nicole VegiottiDatawizard, Rome, Italy.
Yuri QuintanaDivision of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-0257
Petra WilsonEuropean Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent University, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 875299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prescribing by international non-proprietary name (INN) and substitution rules are advocated in the education and practice of rational prescribing, and for cost containment policy. Regulations that restrict or foster INN prescribing and substitution exist in all member states. The aim of this study is to describe the national regulations in European Union (EU) countries, to nation-specific tools for ePrescribing and eDispensation systems based on the standards for Identification of Medicinal Products (IDMP) in the European Health Data Space. A survey was sent to the policy makers from national competent authorities, active in UNICOM, and responsible for writing and monitoring national regulations. Data were collected from 14 EU countries. INN prescribing is mandatory in Greece, Portugal, and Estonia. It is allowed in Germany, Belgium, Norway, Spain, the Netherlands, and Italy (seldom used). Substitution based on precise substance and dose form is mandatory in Finland and Sweden, and allowed in Ireland (with a positive list). In Austria and Croatia, only brand substitution is possible. Rules for a substitution module in the cross-border ePrescribing and eDispensing services can be set up, with three possible levels of equivalent lists: brand substitution, PhPID substitution, and INN substitution. Harmonization of national rules is needed, also for exemptions and the possibility of physician's veto. This may be facilitated by the implementation of IDMP. The European Commission has the legal basis to foster this harmonization. It will have major implications for research, handling of drug shortages, and clinical care.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsDrug SubstitutionElectronic PrescribingEuropean UnionHumans

Identifiers

PMID41410792
PMCPMC13064843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.