Observational studyZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2026
[Treatment of adult chronic non-bacterial osteitis in Germany : Comparison of real-world practice and current expert consensus recommendations].
Observational study in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age and neutrophil counts at the time of diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica: are they useful or confounding factors in the geriatrician's clinical practice?European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The non-interventional observational study employed both retrospective and prospective approaches to analyze the treatment reality of 114 patients with adult chronic non-bacterial osteitis (CNO) at three German university centers over the period 1985-2025. The primary objective was to characterize treatment courses among adult CNO patients in Germany for and to compare these with the international consensus recommendations published in 2024. According to these recommendations, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are preferred as first-line therapies, whereas tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or bisphosphonates are advised as second-line options.The results indicate that although 61% of patients initially received NSAIDs, only 20% were treated at the recommended first-line dosage. In contrast, 46% of patients received conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) as first-line therapy. Owing to their limited efficacy, csDMARDs are currently recommended only in selected cases with overlapping features of adult CNO and either axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our data demonstrate that overlap was present in 70% of the adult CNO cohort. As recommended, TNFi were the predominant second-line therapy (n = 32/86; 37%), whereas bisphosphonates were administered to only one patient.The observed therapeutic response, assessed by the rate of treatment discontinuation within 12 months, reached a maximum of 53%. These findings underscore the importance of current consensus recommendations in standardizing terminology and optimizing treatment strategies for CNO. However, the lack of a dedicated ICD-10 code and the absence of regulatory approval for the recommended therapeutic agents in Germany remain unresolved challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.