Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410780›Full record

Observational studyZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2026

[Treatment of adult chronic non-bacterial osteitis in Germany : Comparison of real-world practice and current expert consensus recommendations].

Pascal van Wijnen, Philipp Klemm, Michael Schmidt, Konstantinos Christofyllakis, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Gunter Assmann

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pascal van WijnenAbteilung für Rheumatologie und klinische, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, ImmunologieCampus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hessen, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2629-1837
Philipp KlemmAbteilung für Rheumatologie und klinische, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, ImmunologieCampus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hessen, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7911-4235
Michael SchmidtRUB-Universitätsklinikum Minden JWK, Klinik für Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland.
Konstantinos ChristofyllakisJose Carreras Institut für Immun- und Gentherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Saarland, Deutschland.
Ulf Müller-LadnerAbteilung für Rheumatologie und klinische, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, ImmunologieCampus Kerckhoff, Bad Nauheim, Hessen, Deutschland.
Gunter AssmannRUB-Universitätsklinikum Minden JWK, Klinik für Rheumatologie und klinische Immunologie, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland. Gunter.Assmann@muehlenkreiskliniken.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3216-9340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-interventional observational study employed both retrospective and prospective approaches to analyze the treatment reality of 114 patients with adult chronic non-bacterial osteitis (CNO) at three German university centers over the period 1985-2025. The primary objective was to characterize treatment courses among adult CNO patients in Germany for and to compare these with the international consensus recommendations published in 2024. According to these recommendations, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are preferred as first-line therapies, whereas tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or bisphosphonates are advised as second-line options.The results indicate that although 61% of patients initially received NSAIDs, only 20% were treated at the recommended first-line dosage. In contrast, 46% of patients received conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) as first-line therapy. Owing to their limited efficacy, csDMARDs are currently recommended only in selected cases with overlapping features of adult CNO and either axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our data demonstrate that overlap was present in 70% of the adult CNO cohort. As recommended, TNFi were the predominant second-line therapy (n = 32/86; 37%), whereas bisphosphonates were administered to only one patient.The observed therapeutic response, assessed by the rate of treatment discontinuation within 12 months, reached a maximum of 53%. These findings underscore the importance of current consensus recommendations in standardizing terminology and optimizing treatment strategies for CNO. However, the lack of a dedicated ICD-10 code and the absence of regulatory approval for the recommended therapeutic agents in Germany remain unresolved challenges.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsConsensus Statements as TopicOsteitisPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedChronic DiseaseDiphosphonatesFemaleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntirheumatic AgentsDiphosphonatesTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAxial spondyloarthritisClinical overlapDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsPsoriasis-arthritisReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41410780
PMCPMC13086712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.