Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410767›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Electroextraction of low-concentration redox-active heavy metals with E

Ziyuan Huang, Chunhua Feng, Fengchang Wu, Zhenqing Shi, Yang Wang, Zhuoyu Zhang, Rimei Huang, Weijian Duan, Li Tian, Yijin Lv and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Electroextraction of low-concentration redox-active heavy metals with EProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ziyuan HuangKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Chunhua FengKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-7865
Fengchang WuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Zhenqing ShiKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yang WangKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zhuoyu ZhangKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Rimei HuangKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Weijian DuanKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Li TianKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yijin LvKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Xinying GongState Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, Sichuan, China.
Zhengjun GongState Key Laboratory of Bridge Intelligent and Green Construction, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0009-0000-6572-1894
Zhi DangKey Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Fangbai LiGuangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, National-Regional Joint Engineering Research Center for Soil Pollution Control and Remediation in South China, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China.

Funding

GDSTC | Guangdong Special Support Plan () 2019BT02L218Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Program 2025B03J0012National Natural Science Foundation of China 42025701National Natural Science Foundation of China 42321005National Natural Science Foundation of China U21A2034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical recovery of heavy metals from acid mine drainage (AMD) offers a sustainable solution to global AMD contamination, yet remains challenged by thermodynamic and kinetic barriers in reducing redox-active metals with negative standard reduction potentials (E

Indexed as

acid mine drainageelectrochemical metal recoverymetastable intermediateredox-active metalsresource sustainability

Identifiers

PMID41410767
PMCPMC12745790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.