Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410753›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2025

Littoral bryozoan communities in the high Arctic: a latitudinal comparison.

Olga Yu Evseeva, Alexander G Dvoretsky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. First Record ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga Yu EvseevaMurmansk Marine Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (MMBI RAS), Murmansk, Russia.
Alexander G DvoretskyMurmansk Marine Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (MMBI RAS), Murmansk, Russia. ag-dvoretsky@yandex.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The littoral bryozoan communities in the Barents and Greenland Seas have not received as much attention as their deep-water communities. To address this gap, we compared the diversity and biomass patterns of bryozoans across two localities: Eastern Murman (EM), (southern Barents Sea, 69°N) and Grønfjorden (GF), Svalbard (Greenland Sea, 78°N). The study revealed moderate dissimilarity in habitat conditions. Boreo-Arctic species were the most common at both sites, but the proportion of boreal species was higher in EM (28 vs. 7.5%). Biomass tended to be higher at higher latitudes. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant dissimilarity of 94.1% between bryozoan communities at the two study sites. Redundancy analysis demonstrated that substrate type was the primary driving force for bryozoans in GF, whereas diversity indices were positively associated with salinity in EM, and bryozoan biomasses were negatively scaled to temperature. These differences may be attributed to the more stressful conditions in EM, where thermal stress may act as an initial stressor, leading to a reduction in salinity levels that negatively impact bryozoans, rendering them unable to survive in less saline water as they do in GF under more optimal temperature conditions.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBryozoaAnimalsArctic RegionsBiomassEcosystemSalinitySeashoreTemperatureArcticBarents seaBenthosBiodiversityBryozoaCoastal zoneDriving factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.