ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Development of a dual-target measles virus PCR assay and testing trends at a national reference laboratory.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-detection of measles virus vaccine strain and seasonal coronavirus in an immunocompromised patient with pneumonia.ASM case reports · 2026Article
- Toward a quality-managed operational architecture for wastewater surveillance of zoonotic and emerging pathogens.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2025, measles cases in the United States have reached their highest level since the disease was officially declared eliminated in 2000. Molecular assays may assist in the early diagnosis of measles and improve contact tracing efforts. In this manuscript, we describe the validation of a real-time PCR assay on the Hologic Panther Fusion Open Access system for the detection of measles virus (MeV) and differentiation between wild-type and vaccine strains. After implementation, we examined 3 months of clinical testing data to understand testing trends and utilization. Over the study period, a total of 525 tests from 491 patients were performed. MeV was detected in 16 specimens with 6 wild-type and 10 vaccine strain identifications. Children less than 10 years old constituted the largest proportion of tested individuals (54.3%) and vaccine strain detections (9/10, median age 1.2 years), while wild-type infections were observed in individuals aged 20-50 (6/6, median age 32.6 years). Those with vaccine strain detected had significantly higher Ct values for the pan-measles target versus wild-type infections (33.6 vs 28.3;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.