Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410620›Full record

Trial reportRegenerative medicine2025

Evaluating the utility of a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) end-of-trial event to re-engage with cell-based therapy participants.

Deepak Menon, Jan-Herman Kuiper, Andrea Bailey, Michael Murphy, Yumna Ladha, Peter Gallacher, Paul Jermin, Andrew Roberts, Geraint Thomas, Charlotte H Hulme and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deepak MenonCentre for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Jan-Herman KuiperOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Andrea BaileyOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Michael MurphyOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Yumna LadhaOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Peter GallacherOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Paul JerminOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Andrew RobertsOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Geraint ThomasCentre for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Charlotte H HulmeOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.
Karina T WrightOswestry Keele Orthopaedic Research Group (OsKOR), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough research in cell-based therapy is expanding, little is known about patient experience in cell therapy trials to-date. This study explores the experience and attitudes of participants involved in the ASCOT randomized controlled trial, a long-term orthopedic study comparing different cell therapies for the treatment of knee articular cartilage defects.

methodsThe clinical and rehabilitation experience of participants, and their attitudes relating to i) patient and public involvement (PPIE) in research and ii) future research on cellular therapy and clinical trials were explored through questionnaires. To gather this information, the utility of an end-of-trial event to reengage participants was evaluated.

resultsDespite the anticipated high burden, overall trial experience was reported as highly positive. Communication and ongoing engagement between patients and both the clinical and research teams may have contributed to this. Key challenges identified for future research include the need for early and transparent communication regarding trial results, and greater support to facilitate active PPIE involvement. The end-of-trial engagement event demonstrated feasibility and value as a model to gather this important PPIE data for future studies.

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of integrating participant perspectives to optimize trial design and delivery in future cell therapy research.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyPatient ParticipationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesautologous chondrocyte implantationcartilage injuryCell-based therapypatient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE)patient perspectivesstem-cell implanation

Identifiers

PMID41410620
PMCPMC12915861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.