Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410526›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: the importance of animal science flight simulators to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of livestock production.

Hector M Menendez Iii, Young Chang, Erika Palmer, Federica La Manna, Elias R V Moreno, Ira Parsons, Benjamin L Turner, Hossein Moradi Rekabdarkolaee, Aletta L Husmann, Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hector M Menendez IiiSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center, South Dakota State University, Dr Rapid City, SD 57701.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-7237
Young ChangDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.
Erika PalmerDepartment of Physical Sciences and Industrial Systems, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, 3616 Norway.
Federica La MannaSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center, South Dakota State University, Dr Rapid City, SD 57701.
Elias R V MorenoSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center, South Dakota State University, Dr Rapid City, SD 57701.
Ira ParsonsSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center, South Dakota State University, Dr Rapid City, SD 57701.ORCID 0000-0001-8813-4190
Benjamin L TurnerDepartment of Agriculture, Agribusiness, and Environmental Science, King Ranch Institute for Ranch Management, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX 78363.
Hossein Moradi RekabdarkolaeeDepartment of Business Analytics, Economics, and Information Systems, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.ORCID 0000-0003-3449-4953
Aletta L HusmannSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center, South Dakota State University, Dr Rapid City, SD 57701.
Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-4911

Funding

USDA-AFRI IDEAS 2022-69014-36670- 36670USDA Hatch #SD00H729-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex livestock production problems are barriers to achieving long-term sustainability and profitability. Mathematical nutrition models are an integral component of daily livestock feeding systems, as they help improve animal performance, productivity, and environmental sustainability while maintaining or reducing costs. Different actors, such as research institutions, single-owner farmers or ranchers, integrated livestock producers, or technology providers, have different needs for mathematical models. Many actors use spreadsheets and existing empirical models for nutrition and management, while others use mechanistic, dynamic, or artificial intelligence models. Regardless of model type, understanding the complexity of livestock systems is important, especially as many modeling projects often fail to give new insights to experienced actors within these systems. Flight simulators, also known as decision support tools, help identify high-leverage solutions while causing learning that leads to insight. However, understanding interrelationships between the parts of a system is difficult because intended and unintended consequences are often delayed. Our article reviews the pipeline of developing a flight simulator and contextualizes it within relevant technological-economic-agriculture issues, such as the growing use of precision livestock farming and associated cyberinfrastructure concerns. Fully documented and easy-to-use flight simulators provide a means to introduce stakeholders (actors) to a methodology for generating insights, as users design and run model scenarios for themselves, thereby challenging their mental models. This experiential learning is often more impactful (compared with someone telling them) because insight is gained as the actors challenge their own mental models through inductively or deductively assessing equations, parameters, and outcomes. As precision livestock technology increases on-farm, so do the intended and unintended consequences of data collection, maintenance, model development, deployment, and scale for enhancing animal production. Flight simulators help actors anticipate desired reinforcing actions such as increasing efficiencies and balancing actions within systems that slow the growth of efficiencies such as new training, labor, or infrastructure to manage large datasets or cyberinfrastructure concerns.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLivestockModels, TheoreticalAnimalsComputer Simulationbig data flowscapability trapsflight simulatorsmodelingnutrition

Identifiers

PMID41410526
PMCPMC12893780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.