Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410523›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: agent‑based modeling of nutrient requirements and growth performance in growing-finishing pigs for sustainable production systems.

Atefeh Rahimifar, Karun Kaniyamattam, Jeffrey G Wiegert, Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atefeh RahimifarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Karoon Institute of Higher Education, Ahvaz.
Karun KaniyamattamDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-3575
Jeffrey G WiegertDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471.
Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nutritional requirements of growing-finishing pigs are based on a complex interplay of parameters like feed intake (FI), metabolism, and other environmental conditions. We developed an individual-based model to estimate the growth performance and nutritional requirements of growing-finishing pigs. Our model implementation follows the principles and equations published by the 2012 Swine National Research Council (NRC) model, focusing on reflecting the attributes of each pig and its interaction with the environment. The proposed swine nutrition system (SNS) utilized an agent-based model framework and was developed using NetLogo to simulate the dynamics of pig nutrition systems. The main factors incorporated in the model were body weight (BW) gain (BWG), start and finish BW, and the sex of the pigs. Results showed that the model can accurately estimate foundational parameters of pigs' biological growth, including BW, FI, metabolizable energy intake (MEI), protein deposition (Pd), and lipid deposition (Ld). In addition, the daily requirements, such as amino acid, calcium, and phosphorus requirements, were calculated separately for each pig. The model accurately demonstrates known differences in pig growth characteristics, such as greater Ld in barrows, greater daily protein accretion, and dietary standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements in boars. The proposed model was evaluated by comparing SNS predictions' correlation and coefficient of determination (r2) to those of the 2012 Swine NRC model's predictions. The simulations were conducted for 500 pigs to demonstrate the repeatability of the SNS. The average, standard deviation, and the 95% confidence interval were obtained over the growth period of the pigs for the parameters, such as BWG, BW, Pd, Ld, MEI, and FI. The correlation between BWG from the SNS and BWG from the NRC was r2 = 0.84 for gilts, r2 = 0.93 for barrows, and r2 = 0.93 for boars. Also, the direct comparison between the SNS and the 2012 Swine NRC indicated an r2 > 0.99 for the three sexes. SNS enabled the simulation of individual animal behavior, nutrient partitioning, and variability in growth performance, which are capabilities not afforded by traditional aggregate models. Thus, real-world implementation of SNS might improve feeding and management strategies within commercial swine production systems, leading to greater production efficiency and sustainability in the pork sector.

Indexed as

Nutritional RequirementsAnimal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalSwineagent-based modelinggrowing-finishing pigsnutrition requirementpork production managementswine nutrition

Identifiers

PMID41410523
PMCPMC12924631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.