Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410519›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: review of time series techniques and machine learning models for advancing livestock production.

Jesto Peter, Mo Li, Jameson Brennan, Hector Menendez, Hossein Moradi Rekabdarkolaee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesto PeterDepartment of Business Analytics, Economics, and Information Systems, Bowling Green State University, Allen W. and Carol M. Schmidthorst College of Business Bowling Green, OH, 43403, United States.
Mo LiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5188-9346
Jameson BrennanSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center  711 N. Creek Dr., Rapid City, South Dakota, United States.
Hector MenendezSouth Dakota State University West River Research and Extension Center  711 N. Creek Dr., Rapid City, South Dakota, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-7237
Hossein Moradi RekabdarkolaeeDepartment of Business Analytics, Economics, and Information Systems, Bowling Green State University, Allen W. and Carol M. Schmidthorst College of Business, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3449-4953

Funding

The Data Science for Food and Agricultural Systems (DSFAS) 2022-67022-37023United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2022-67022-37023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correlated data, including time series where observations depend on previous values, frequently occur in various livestock production studies. There are many statistical models and machine learning algorithms that have been developed to analyze this type of data. This paper provides a review of these models. Specifically, a detailed overview of the AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous inputs (ARIMAX) model, Dynamic Models and Kalman Filtering (KF), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Transformer models are provided. This review focuses on steps to train different statistical and machine learning models and lists the advantages and limitations of each model.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLivestockMachine LearningAnimalsNeural Networks, ComputerARIMAXautocorrelationdeep learningdynamic modelslearning ratelinear models

Identifiers

PMID41410519
PMCPMC12863955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.