Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410516›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: revolutionizing animal farming with artificial intelligence: trends, challenges, and opportunities.

Isabella C F S Condotta, Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabella C F S CondottaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801.ORCID 0000-0002-3130-7668
Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can transform livestock farming as producers start using data-driven decisions in key areas, such as animal health, reproduction, behavior, nutrition, and production management. This review examines how AI technologies, like machine learning, computer vision, and sensor-based systems, help monitor and manage livestock more precisely, efficiently, and responsively. From early disease detection and estrus prediction to real-time behavior tracking and automated feeding systems, AI offers powerful tools for improving productivity, enhancing animal welfare, and supporting sustainable farm operations. Despite the promising technological advances, adopting AI in livestock systems comes with significant challenges. These include issues related to data quality and availability, model generalizability, infrastructure limitations, and ethical concerns involving data privacy and animal welfare. This review critically examines these obstacles and points out the need for robust, interpretable AI solutions that can adapt to specific farm conditions and offer meaningful explanations to end-users. Emerging trends like multimodal sensor fusion, digital twins, edge AI, and the integration of AI with genomics and climate data offer exciting possibilities for next-generation livestock management and smart farming systems. It is equally crucial to focus on human-centered design, participatory design, and group model-building approaches to ensure AI tools are accessible, trusted, and address the real needs of farmers and caregivers. This article explores AI's potential to change livestock farming while advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration, inclusive innovation, and responsible deployment. It synthesizes current applications, challenges, and research frontiers. Ultimately, AI's impact on animal agriculture depends on technical advancements as well as our ability to integrate these tools into systems that are biologically sound, socially accepted, and ethically responsible.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaArtificial IntelligenceLivestockAnimalsdigital agricultureprecision livestock farmingsensor integrationsmart farming

Identifiers

PMID41410516
PMCPMC12875599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.