Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410510›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: contributions of mathematical modeling to life cycle assessment to support environmental sustainability of animal production.

Alice Cadéro, Luis Orlindo Tedeschi, Florence Garcia-Launay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice CadéroPEGASE, INRAE, Institut-Agro, 16 Le Clos, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-564X
Luis Orlindo TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-4911
Florence Garcia-LaunayPEGASE, INRAE, Institut-Agro, 16 Le Clos, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-4433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) provides a standardized framework for evaluating the environmental impacts of animal production systems through its four key steps: 1) goal and scope definition, 2) inventory analysis, 3) impact assessment, and 4) interpretation. However, traditional approaches using surveys and experimental data face limitations in capturing complex interactions among biological processes and management practices. This paper reviews how mathematical modeling can enhance LCA methodology for animal production systems, overcoming these constraints and supporting more robust environmental impact assessments. Mathematical models contribute significantly to LCA methodology at multiple scales and stages. At the inventory analysis stage, models predict feed intake, growth, production, and excretion of nutrients in response to animal characteristics and management practices. These range from nutritional metabolic models of average animals to sophisticated individual-based models that account for variability among animals in a herd. A systematic workflow could be followed for developing stochastic, individual-based models that generate comprehensive life cycle inventories through a bottom-up approach. Process-based models also improve emission estimates from animals and manure, progressing from simple Tier 1 default emission factors to complex Tier 3 mechanistic approaches that capture interactions between management practices and environmental factors. However, significant challenges remain in modeling manure emissions due to complex data requirements and microbial dynamics. Beyond inventory development, mathematical modeling enhances LCA's utility for decision support through optimization models that identify mitigation strategies balancing environmental and economic objectives. Individual-based models enable environmental phenotyping for genetic selection by quantifying how individual animal traits affect system-level impacts. These approaches represent promising developments for sustainable livestock production. Mathematical modeling transforms LCA from a descriptive tool to a predictive framework capable of evaluating numerous scenarios across different production contexts. Further development should focus on integrating performance and emission models, implementing optimization approaches for mitigation strategy identification, and expanding applications to regional and national scales to support evidence-based policies.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaConservation of Natural ResourcesLivestockModels, TheoreticalAnimalsEnvironmentModels, Biologicalenvironmental impactindividual-based modelslivestock productionmitigation strategiesprocess-based models

Identifiers

PMID41410510
PMCPMC12863956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.