Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41410412›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2025

The public health ethics and economics of prioritizing prevention and equity.

Kathryn Hamilton, Frances C Butcher, Jane Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathryn HamiltonNorth Bristol NHS Trust and University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-6605-1022
Frances C ButcherEthox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Jane PowellUniversity of the West of England, BS16 1QY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internationally there are significant challenges to improving and protecting population health through effective prevention. In this novel analysis, we integrate public health evidence, ethics, and economics to argue that current health resourcing strategies neglect prevention, underestimate the social determinants of health, and fail to engage with the ethical dimensions of economic decision-making. We highlight the risk that overreliance on economic evidence may marginalize underserved populations, where data are limited, thereby deepening health inequalities. We conclude that improving population health and reducing disparities requires reframing prevention through both ethical and economic lenses. Investing in community-based, equity-oriented interventions can deliver sustained health and economic gains and support a more inclusive and resilient health system.

Indexed as

Health EquityHealth PrioritiesPublic HealthHumansSocial Determinants of Healtheconomicsethicspopulation-based and preventative services

Identifiers

PMID41410412
PMCPMC12712984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.