ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Dynamics of circulating tumour DNA in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The response to salvage chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor, and data on circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) in this setting are limited. We evaluated ctDNA dynamics in 29 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who received platinum-based salvage chemotherapy at the University Medical Center Groningen. In total, 124 plasma samples were analysed using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing to detect copy number alterations (CNAs) and targeted sequencing with a 115-gene panel for single- and multi-nucleotide variants (SNVs/MNVs). The complete response rate at the end of treatment was 55%, with a 1-year progression-free survival of 31%. At the R/R baseline, defined as the time after confirmation of relapse or refractory status and prior to initiation of salvage chemotherapy, CNAs were detected in 15 patients, SNVs in 27 and MNVs in 21. Patients with treatment failure had higher fraction of genome altered (FGA) and ctDNA levels at baseline. Low FGA combined with low metabolic tumour volume (MTV) at baseline was associated with favourable outcome. Clearance of all baseline SNVs at interim evaluation correlated with improved response, while persistence predicted failure (p < 0.05). Two of three patients with complete metabolic response at the end of treatment and detectable ctDNA relapsed, indicating ctDNA as a sensitive marker of minimal residual disease. These findings indicate the value of ctDNA profiling as a prognostic biomarker and as a tool for response-adapted treatment strategies in R/R DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.