ArticleJournal of evidence-based medicine2025
Patient Version of Guideline for Fibromyalgia (2025 Edition).
Article in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Fibromyalgia: A Moving Target.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- The Gür fibromyalgia model: a clinically operational framework for phenotype-informed, sequence-sensitive multimodal care.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an evidence-based patient version of guideline (PVG) for fibromyalgia, aiming to improve patients' understanding of disease symptoms and therapeutic options and to enhance their self-management abilities.
methodsFollowing the World Health Organization Handbook for Guideline Development (2014), a multidisciplinary working group was established, including patient representatives, physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and methodologists. The process comprised (a) systematic retrieval of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements to establish the evidence base; (b) integration of large language models (LLMs) with expert review to identify and refine key patient-centered concerns; (c) a three-round Delphi consensus guided by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to finalize clinical questions and formulate recommendations; and (d) evaluation of understandability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Print Materials (PEMAT-P).
resultsThe final PVG covers 13 clinical questions across seven domains, including disease awareness, diagnostic evaluation, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and long-term management. All recommendations were rated as strong. The guideline emphasizes the importance of pharmacological management, emotional regulation, and exercise in the comprehensive management of fibromyalgia. The PEMAT-P assessment showed an understandability score of 100%.
conclusionsDeveloped collaboratively by a multidisciplinary team and patient representatives, this PVG is based on 13 evidence-based fibromyalgia guidelines. Combining LLMs with expert review enhanced question generation and readability. The PVG provides a practical and accessible tool to support early self-management in fibromyalgia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.