ArticleAllergy2026
Basophil Activation Test as Biomarker of Severity and Threshold of Allergic Reactions to Cow's Milk During Oral Food Challenges.
Article in Allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03309488 (Basophil Activation Test to Diagnose Food Allergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Basophil Activation Test to Diagnose Food Allergy
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Casein sIgE avidity and milk basophil reactivity in children with cow's milk allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Article
- Emerging Biomarkers in Pediatric Food Allergy: From Mechanistic Endotyping to Precision Diagnosis and Therapeutic Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Allergenicity assessment of novel foods - lessons from immune endotyping of food-allergic patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCow's milk allergy is the most common food allergy worldwide and the top cause of food anaphylaxis fatalities. Identifying patients at higher risk of severe symptoms as well as patients with a lower threshold of reactivity would improve their management. We aimed to assess the utility of putative biomarkers to identify these high-risk patients.
methodsThe severity of allergic reactions to baked milk (BM) and to fresh milk (FM) during oral food challenges (OFC) was assessed prospectively during the BAT2 study (NCT03309488), according to the Practall guidelines. Demographic, clinical and immunological parameters were compared between severe/non-severe and higher/lower threshold reactors to BM or FM. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses were performed to measure the accuracy of biomarkers with discriminative ability.
resultsSeventy-one children reacted to cow's milk: 22 (15%) to BM and 49 (43%) to FM. Seven (32%) and 12 (24%) reactors had severe symptoms during OFC to BM and FM, respectively. The median cumulative dose of milk protein tolerated was 0.44 g for BM and 0.143 g for FM. The basophil activation test (BAT) was the only biomarker that could distinguish severity and threshold groups. BAT optimal cut-offs had 71% sensitivity and 100% specificity to identify severe reactors to BM and 96% sensitivity and 41% specificity to identify children reacting to 0.143 g or less of FM.
conclusionsBAT was the only biomarker for severity and threshold of allergic reactions to BM and FM, respectively. Once applied to clinical practice, BAT can help risk-stratify cow's milk allergic patients and improve their management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.