ArticleBMJ open2025
Quality assessment of irritable bowel syndrome-related medical information on major video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The quality of video information related to smoking cessation on mainstream short-video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about Sjögren syndrome on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of semaglutide-related health information on Chinese short-video platforms: a cross-sectional study of Bilibili and TikTok.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn China, a large number of health-related short videos are posted on video platforms, including educational videos about irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and quality of IBS-related video content on TikTok, Kwai and BiliBili.
methodsUsing 'irritable bowel syndrome' as the Chinese keyword, a new account was registered on each platform. On 1 November 2023, searches were conducted on TikTok, Kwai and BiliBili, and the top 100 recommended videos from each platform were analysed. After those that met the predefined exclusion criteria were removed, 244 short videos were included and evaluated for their characteristics, content, reliability and quality. Information quality was assessed using the
resultsA total of 244 eligible short videos were included. BiliBili videos were longer than TikTok and Kwai videos (p<0.001), and TikTok videos were more popular than Kwai and BiliBili videos. The proportion of health professionals was the highest on TikTok and the lowest on BiliBili. The proportion of general users was the highest on Kwai and the lowest on TikTok. The median JAMA scores of TikTok, Kwai and BiliBili videos were 3 (IQR 2-3), 3 (IQR 2-3) and 2 (IQR 2-3), respectively. The median GQS scores of TikTok, Kwai and BiliBili videos were 3 (IQR 2-4), 3 (IQR 2-4) and 3 (IQR 3-4), and the median modified DISCERN scores were 3 (IQR 2.75-3), 3 (IQR 3-3), and 3 (IQR 2-4), respectively. Video source was an influencing factor for JAMA scores, whereas video duration and source were influencing factors for GQS scores. The number of days since publication (r=0.19, p=0.003) and duration (r=0.27, p<0.001) were positively correlated with GQS scores, whereas likes (r=0.18, p=0.004), comments (r=0.21, p=0.001) and collections (r=0.21, p=0.001) were positively correlated with modified DISCERN scores.
conclusionShort videos of IBS-related health information on TikTok, Kwai and BiliBili were of poor quality; however, videos uploaded by health professionals and science communicators were relatively more reliable and comprehensive. Thus, the public are recommended to learn about IBS-relevant information through videos uploaded by health professionals and science communicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.