ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026
Development and validation of multivariable risk adjustment models for return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in England.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsRisk adjustment models can support clinical decision-making and enable comparative reporting to drive quality improvement. To develop and validate risk adjustment models for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital handover and survival to hospital discharge among patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), using national registry data. METHODS AND
resultsPatients with OHCA in England from 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017, where resuscitation was attempted by the emergency medical service, were included. Data were sourced from the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes registry. The 2016 cohort (n = 27 942) was used for model development and the 2017 cohort (n = 28 425) for validation. Outcomes were ROSC at hospital handover and survival to hospital discharge. Candidate predictors were age, sex, witnessed status, aetiology, bystander CPR, initial rhythm, and public access defibrillator use. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed using backward stepwise selection. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and classification metrics. Across the full study dataset, ROSC occurred in 28.6% of cases and survival in 8.2%. All candidate predictors were retained for ROSC, while sex was excluded from the final survival model. The ROSC model had an AUC of 0.702 (95% CI: 0.694-0.711) in development and 0.712 (0.704-0.719) in validation, with Brier scores of 0.182 in both. The survival model had an AUC of 0.877 (0.868-0.887) in development and 0.871 (0.862-0.879) in validation, with Brier scores of 0.059 and 0.061, respectively.
conclusionThese validated models demonstrated strong performance, improved on previous models, and may support benchmarking, audit, and quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.