ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Untangling the complex web of alcohol policy needs and potential solutions in Brazil: evidence from civil society and political stakeholders.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Steatotic liver disease in Latin America: current views and perspectives.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementing evidence-based alcohol policies can reduce the negative impact of alcohol consumption on public health. However, Brazil has permissive alcohol policies and weakly adheres to World Health Organization's recommendations as the 'best buys'. To explore stakeholders' perceptions of alcohol policy needs and barriers in Brazil, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 stakeholders, including 15 from civil society and 16 policymakers. Civil society participants included non-governmental organization leaders addressing alcohol-related issues, while policymakers comprised civil servants and politicians experienced in alcohol-related harms. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using a deductive approach guided by research questions and an inductive approach to identify emergent themes. Most participants supported World Health Organization-recommended 'best buy' policies regulating alcohol's marketing. However, agreement on price and availability control was not unanimous. All participants acknowledged significant political barriers to adopting these policies, including intentional delays in parliamentary voting, industry lobbying, and arguments about infringing on rights such as freedom. Facing obstacles to advancing population-level policies, stakeholders often shifted their focus to individual-level interventions, such as education and treatment. While these were recognized as less effective, educational efforts were highlighted for raising public awareness of alcohol's harms and changing normative beliefs. Participants noted the lack of a formal coalition to reduce alcohol-related harm, despite its perceived necessity. Overall, stakeholders supported population-level alcohol policies but were pessimistic about their implementation due to political barriers. Many, particularly from civil society, emphasized small-scale, targeted interventions as a more feasible alternative to address alcohol-related harm in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.